- ANSYS MECHANICAL
Your FEA Model Says One Thing. Your Test Rig Says Another. Here's How to Fix That.
- The Problem
Why "it works in simulation" keeps failing on the test bench
- The Fix
A repeatable correlation workflow, built around Ansys Mechanical
- What's Inside
11 sections, written for engineers who need to act on it Monday morning
Executive Summary
The business case in three numbers
Why HPC Matters
From warranty cost to brand perception
The Test-Simulation Gap
Six real sources of disagreement
EMA vs. FEA Fundamentals
What each method actually measures
Correlation Metrics
Frequency deviation, MAC, FRF overlay
Step-by-Step Workflow
The full 8-step Ansys Mechanical process
Case Example
Correlating a geared motor assembly
Pitfalls & Best Practices
What quietly ruins a correlation study
Business Impact
Time, cost and quality, quantified
Getting Started
How Corengg scopes an implementation
About Corengg
Our Ansys practice in South India
45–60%
Typical reduction in late-stage NVH rework when correlation is built into the design cycle
3–5
Design iterations that can shift from physical prototypes to simulation once a model is correlated
±5%
Frequency deviation generally considered an acceptable correlation target
Illustrative industry ranges cited for context in the white paper; actual outcomes vary by product and modelling maturity.
- Illustrative Case
Tracing a gearbox whine back to a single structural mode
After tuning boundary and joint stiffness within physically realistic ranges, frequency deviation falls within target tolerance and MAC confirms every mode is correctly matched.
- DOWNLOAD
Get the full white paper, free
- 11-section PDF white paper with a full table of contents
- The 8-step Ansys Mechanical correlation workflow
- Illustrative geared motor correlation case study
- A best-practices checklist you can apply on your next program
Request the White Paper
Your information is used only to send you this resource and relevant follow-up.